Rose v. Stokely

253 Mich. App. 733
CourtMichigan Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 29, 2002
DocketDocket No. 241029
StatusPublished

This text of 253 Mich. App. 733 (Rose v. Stokely) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rose v. Stokely, 253 Mich. App. 733 (Mich. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

The Court orders that a special panel shall be convened pursuant to MCR 7.215(1) to resolve the conflict between this case and Thompson v Merritt, 192 Mich App 412; 481 NW2d 735 (1991).

The Court further orders under MCR 7.215(T)(5) that the portion of the opinion concerning the conflict addressed in section in of the opinion released October 1, 2002, is vacated.

The appellant may file a supplemental brief within 21 days of the Clerk’s certification of this order. Appellee may file a supplemental brief within 21 days of service of appellant’s brief. Nine copies must be filed with the Clerk of the Court.

McDonald, X, did not participate

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thompson v. Merritt
481 N.W.2d 735 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
253 Mich. App. 733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-v-stokely-michctapp-2002.