Rose v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co.
This text of 246 A.D. 785 (Rose v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, in which the complaint was dismissed at the close of plaintiff’s case on the ground that the [786]*786plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law, judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. We are of the opinion that, upon the evidence submitted, the question of plaintiff’s contributory negligence was one of fact for the jury. Young, Hagarty, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., not voting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
246 A.D. 785, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-v-staten-island-rapid-transit-railway-co-nyappdiv-1935.