Rose v. State

286 S.W. 230, 104 Tex. Crim. 606, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 940
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 16, 1926
DocketNo. 10321.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 286 S.W. 230 (Rose v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rose v. State, 286 S.W. 230, 104 Tex. Crim. 606, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 940 (Tex. 1926).

Opinion

BAKER, Judge.

The appellant was convicted in the Criminal District Court No. 2 of Dallas -County for the offense of theft of property over the value of $50.00, and his punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary.

There is no statement of facts in the record, and no notice of appeal was given in the lower court. Without proper notice of appeal, this court is without jurisdiction. Art. 827, 1925 C. C. P. (Art. 915, Vernon’s C. C. P.) ; Baldwin v. State, 82 Tex. Crim. Rep. 243, 199 S. W. 468; Williams v. State, 87 Tex. Crim. Rep. 180, 220 S. W. 87.

Failing to find any notice of appeal in the record, this appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bales v. State
18 S.W.2d 1086 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)
Johnson v. State
13 S.W.2d 114 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Hollifield v. State
10 S.W.2d 101 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
286 S.W. 230, 104 Tex. Crim. 606, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 940, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-v-state-texcrimapp-1926.