Rose v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Rose v. State

1935 OK CR 143, 53 P.2d 1199, 58 Okla. Crim. 121, 1935 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 170

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedOctober 25, 1935

DocketNo. A-8939.

StatusPublished

This text of 1935 OK CR 143 (Rose v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rose v. State, 1935 OK CR 143, 53 P.2d 1199, 58 Okla. Crim. 121, 1935 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 170 (Okla. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of manslaughter, and his punishment assessed at a term of four years in the state penitentiary.

A copy of the record and case-made was filed in this court on the 18th day of June, 1935. No brief has been filed in support of the defendant’s assignment of errors.

A careful examination of the record fails to disclose any fundamental or prejudicial errors. The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict. The case is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of manslaughter, and his punishment assessed at a term of four years in the state penitentiary.

A copy of the record and case-made was filed in this court on the 18th day of June, 1935. No brief has been filed in support of the defendant’s assignment of errors.

A careful examination of the record fails to disclose any fundamental or prejudicial errors. The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict. The case is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1935 OK CR 143, 53 P.2d 1199, 58 Okla. Crim. 121, 1935 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-v-state-oklacrimapp-1935.