Rose v. State
191 S.E. 200, 55 Ga. App. 699, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 468
Opinion
The defendants were convicted of simple larceny (cattle-stealing) . The evidence for the State amply authorized the verdict. The defendants introduced no evidence, but made their statements to [700] tlie jury. Evidently tlie jury, as they had the right to do, rejected the statements, and accepted as true the testimony of the witnesses for the State. The special grounds of the motion for new trial are without merit. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rose v. State, 191 S.E. 200, 55 Ga. App. 699, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 468 (Ga. Ct. App. 1937).
191 S.E. 200 (Rose v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Reeves v. State
197 S.E.2d 843 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)