Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Rose v. State

Rose v. State

191 S.E. 200, 55 Ga. App. 699, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 468
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 10, 1937
Docket26142
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 191 S.E. 200 (Rose v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rose v. State, 191 S.E. 200, 55 Ga. App. 699, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 468 (Ga. Ct. App. 1937).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The defendants were convicted of simple larceny (cattle-stealing) . The evidence for the State amply authorized the verdict. The defendants introduced no evidence, but made their statements to [700]*700tlie jury. Evidently tlie jury, as they had the right to do, rejected the statements, and accepted as true the testimony of the witnesses for the State. The special grounds of the motion for new trial are without merit. Judgment affirmed.

Decided April 10, 1937. Farr & Mitchell, for plaintiff in error. John 8. Gibson•, solicitor-general, contra. MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reeves v. State
197 S.E.2d 843 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
191 S.E. 200, 55 Ga. App. 699, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-v-state-gactapp-1937.