Rose v. Smith
225 N.E.2d 891, 19 N.Y.2d 733, 279 N.Y.S.2d 187, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1674
This text of 225 N.E.2d 891 (Rose v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rose v. Smith, 225 N.E.2d 891, 19 N.Y.2d 733, 279 N.Y.S.2d 187, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1674 (N.Y. 1967).
Opinion
Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge.Fuld and Judges Van Voobhis, Bubke, Soileppi, Bergan and Keating. Talcing no part: Judge Bkeitel.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Caserta v. Pennisi
33 A.D.2d 564 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1969)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
225 N.E.2d 891, 19 N.Y.2d 733, 279 N.Y.S.2d 187, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-v-smith-ny-1967.