Rose v. Smith

225 N.E.2d 891, 19 N.Y.2d 733, 279 N.Y.S.2d 187, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1674
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 2, 1967·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge.Fuld and Judges Van Voobhis, Bubke, Soileppi, Bergan and Keating. Talcing no part: Judge Bkeitel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rose v. Smith, 225 N.E.2d 891, 19 N.Y.2d 733, 279 N.Y.S.2d 187, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1674 (N.Y. 1967).

225 N.E.2d 891 (Rose v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Caserta v. Pennisi
33 A.D.2d 564 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1969)