Rose v. Simon
This text of 283 A.D. 827 (Rose v. Simon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Defendant, as owner of a parcel of real property, had contracted with one Milano, as general contractor, for the construction of a residence on said property. The action is by subcontractors to recover the claimed balance due upon the subcontract and is based upon defendant’s alleged promise to pay said balance. The appeal is by plaintiffs from a judgment of the County Court of the County of Westchester in favor of defendant after trial before an Official Referee. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Wenzel, Acting P. J„ MacCrate, Schmidt, Beldock and Murphy, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
283 A.D. 827, 129 N.Y.S.2d 252, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-v-simon-nyappdiv-1954.