Rose v. Sieber (In re Sieber)

Fourth Circuit

Rose v. Sieber (In re Sieber)

448 F. App'x 382

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 4, 2011·No. No. 11-1423·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Derrick S. Sieber appeals the district court’s order accepting the bankruptcy court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law and entering judgment in favor of the bankruptcy trustee. See Bankr.R. 9033. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Rose v. Sieber, Nos. 8:10-cv-02437-RWT; 0:09-ap-00825; 0:07-bk-21192 (D. Md. Apr. 12 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Derrick S. Sieber appeals the district court’s order accepting the bankruptcy court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law and entering judgment in favor of the bankruptcy trustee. See Bankr.R. 9033. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Rose v. Sieber, Nos. 8:10-cv-02437-RWT; 0:09-ap-00825; 0:07-bk-21192 (D. Md. Apr. 12 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Rose v. Sieber (In re Sieber), 448 F. App'x 382 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

448 F. App'x 382 (Rose v. Sieber (In re Sieber)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.