Rose v. Sieber (In re Sieber)

448 F. App'x 382
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 4, 2011
DocketNo. 11-1423
StatusPublished

This text of 448 F. App'x 382 (Rose v. Sieber (In re Sieber)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rose v. Sieber (In re Sieber), 448 F. App'x 382 (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Derrick S. Sieber appeals the district court’s order accepting the bankruptcy court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law and entering judgment in favor of the bankruptcy trustee. See Bankr.R. 9033. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Rose v. Sieber, Nos. 8:10-cv-02437-RWT; 0:09-ap-00825; 0:07-bk-21192 (D. Md. Apr. 12 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
448 F. App'x 382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-v-sieber-in-re-sieber-ca4-2011.