Rose v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedFebruary 29, 2024
Docket22-1132V
StatusUnpublished

This text of Rose v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Rose v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rose v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2024).

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: January 9, 2024

* * * * * * * * * * * * * ROBERT ROSE, * * Petitioner, * No. 22-1132V * v. * Special Master Gowen * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Meredith Daniels, Conway Homer, P.C., Boston, MA, for petitioner. Mary E. Holmes, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent.

DECISION ON STIPULATION1

On August 30, 2022, Robert Rose (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Program.2 Petition (ECF No. 1). Petitioner alleges that as a result of receiving an influenza (“flu”) vaccine on November 24, 2019, he suffered from transverse myelitis. Id.; Stipulation for Award (“Stip.”) (ECF No. 31).

On January 8, 2024, respondent filed a stipulation providing that a decision should be entered awarding compensation to petitioner. Stip. Respondent denies that the flu vaccine is the cause of petitioner’s alleged transverse myelitis, or any other injury, or his current condition. Id. at ¶ 6. Maintaining their respective positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the compensation to the petitioner according to the terms of the stipulation attached hereto as Appendix A. Id. at ¶ 7.

1 Pursuant to the E-Government Act of 2002, see 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012), because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it to a publicly available website. This decision will appear at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc or on the Court of Federal Claims website. This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the Internet. Before the decision is posted on the court’s website, each party has 14 days to file a motion requesting redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). “An objecting party must provide the court with a proposed redacted version of the decision.” Id. If neither party files a motion for redaction within 14 days, the decision will be posted on the court’s website without any changes. Id.

2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2012) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa. The stipulation provides:

1) A lump sum of $45,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

I adopt the parties’ stipulation attached hereto, and award compensation in the amount and on the terms set forth therein. The Clerk of the Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Thomas L. Gowen Thomas L. Gowen Special Master

3 Entry of judgment is expedited by each party’s filing notice renouncing the right to seek review. Vaccine Rule 11(a). IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

) ROBERT ROSE, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) No. 22-1132V ) Special Master Gowen SECRETARY OF ) ECF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) )

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Robert Rose (“petitioner”) filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 to 34 (the “Vaccine

Program”). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to his receipt of a

seasonal influenza (“flu”) vaccination, which is a vaccine contained in the Vaccine Injury Table

(the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3 (a).

2. Petitioner received a flu vaccine on November 24, 2019.

3. The vaccine was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that he suffered Transverse Myelitis (“TM”) as a result of a flu

vaccine received on November 14, 2019.1 Petitioner further alleges that he experienced the

residual effects of this condition for more than six months.

1 Although the petition alleges petitioner received a flu vaccine on November 14, 2019, the parties stipulate petitioner received a flu vaccine on November 24, 2019. 5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages as a result of his condition.

6. Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner’s alleged TM; denies that the

flu vaccine caused or significantly aggravated any injury; and denies that petitioner’s current

condition is a sequelae of a vaccine-related injury.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the

issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with

the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue

the following vaccine compensation payment: A lump sum of $45,000.00, in the form of a

check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be

available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and after

petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings before

the special master to award reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in proceeding upon this

petition.

10. Petitioner and petitioner’s attorney represent that compensation to be provided

pursuant to this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which the Program is not

primarily liable under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g), to the extent that payment has been made or can

2 reasonably be expected to be made under any State compensation programs, insurance policies,

Federal or State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act (42

U.S.C. § 1396 et seq.)), or entities that provide health services on a pre-paid basis.

11. Payment made pursuant to paragraph 8 and any amounts awarded pursuant to

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-1
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rose v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2024.