Rose v. Rose

225 A.D. 859
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rose v. Rose. Read the opinion of the Court — 233 A.D. 368

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Dowling, P. J., Merrell, Finch, O’Malley and Proskauer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rose v. Rose, 225 A.D. 859 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

225 A.D. 859 (Rose v. Rose) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.