Rose v. Rose

521 A.2d 300, 1987 Me. LEXIS 640
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedFebruary 23, 1987
StatusPublished

This text of 521 A.2d 300 (Rose v. Rose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rose v. Rose, 521 A.2d 300, 1987 Me. LEXIS 640 (Me. 1987).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

In this divorce action on the appeal of Dorothy Rose from a judgment of the District Court, Portland, the Superior Court, Cumberland County, vacated the judgment of the District Court and remanded the matter to that court for another hearing on all issues. Richard Rose appealed and Dorothy Rose cross-appealed from the judgment of the Superior Court. Because that judgment is not final for purposes of appeal and this case does not fall within any of the recognized exceptions for which interlocutory appeals may be brought, we conclude that the appeal and cross-appeal must be dismissed as premature. See Luchetti v. Luchetti, 445 A.2d 675, 676 (Me.1982); MacDougall v. MacDougall, 408 A.2d 783, 784 (Me.1979).

The entry is: Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Luchetti v. Luchetti
445 A.2d 675 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
521 A.2d 300, 1987 Me. LEXIS 640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-v-rose-me-1987.