Rose v. Rose

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Rose v. Rose

559 So. 2d 1372, 1990 WL 48261

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 20, 1990

DocketNo. 89-C-0017

StatusPublished

This text of 559 So. 2d 1372 (Rose v. Rose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rose v. Rose, 559 So. 2d 1372, 1990 WL 48261 (La. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Rose, Franklyn D.; — Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or re[1373]*1373view; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 20130-CA; Parish of Lincoln, 3rd Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 32805.

Prior report: La.App., 535 So.2d 1167.

Not considered, not timely filed. The judgment is definitive. This Court’s delay in responding to the finding was prompted by repeated efforts to have counsel for relator provide supplementation to complete the application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Rose, Franklyn D.; — Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or re[1373]*1373view; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 20130-CA; Parish of Lincoln, 3rd Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 32805.

Prior report: La.App., 535 So.2d 1167.

Not considered, not timely filed. The judgment is definitive. This Court’s delay in responding to the finding was prompted by repeated efforts to have counsel for relator provide supplementation to complete the application.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

559 So. 2d 1372, 1990 WL 48261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-v-rose-la-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack