Rose v. Rose

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Rose v. Rose

559 So. 2d 1372, 1990 WL 48261

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided April 20, 1990·No. No. 89-C-0017·Published

Opinion

In re Rose, Franklyn D.; — Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or re[1373] view; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 20130-CA; Parish of Lincoln, 3rd Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 32805.

Prior report: La.App., 535 So.2d 1167.

Not considered, not timely filed. The judgment is definitive. This Court’s delay in responding to the finding was prompted by repeated efforts to have counsel for relator provide supplementation to complete the application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Rose, Franklyn D.; — Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or re[1373] view; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 20130-CA; Parish of Lincoln, 3rd Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 32805.

Prior report: La.App., 535 So.2d 1167.

Not considered, not timely filed. The judgment is definitive. This Court’s delay in responding to the finding was prompted by repeated efforts to have counsel for relator provide supplementation to complete the application.

Rose v. Rose, 559 So. 2d 1372, 1990 WL 48261 (La. 1990).

Pincite

559 So. 2d 1372 (Rose v. Rose) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related