Rose v. Package Machinery Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rose v. Package Machinery Co.

47 A.D.2d 999, 366 N.Y.S.2d 746, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9498

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 23, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 47 A.D.2d 999 (Rose v. Package Machinery Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rose v. Package Machinery Co., 47 A.D.2d 999, 366 N.Y.S.2d 746, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9498 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, with costs, and motion denied.

Memorandum: Plaintiffs, residents of Monroe County, seek to recover damages sustained in an industrial accident which occurred in 1965, alleging it to have been caused by a defective electrical switch manufactured by defendant Square D. Company. On April 13, 1971 at Rochester, New York, pursuant to an order of Special Term, discovery and inspection of the switch has been had by all parties in the presence of their expert engineering representatives. X rays were taken of the switch. On June 8, 1972 plaintiffs served and filed a required statement of readiness. Now 33 months later defendant Square D Company moves for a second discovery and inspection of the switch to be produced at Asheville, North Carolina. Since no motion was made within the 20-day period following the filing of the note of issue and the statement of readiness, the right to conduct further pretrial procedures was waived (Warren v Vick Chem. Co., 37 AD2d 913). (Appeal from order of Monroe Special Term granting motion for discovery.) Present— Marsh, P. J., Moule, Simons, Del Vecchio and Witmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously reversed, with costs, and motion denied.

Memorandum: Plaintiffs, residents of Monroe County, seek to recover damages sustained in an industrial accident which occurred in 1965, alleging it to have been caused by a defective electrical switch manufactured by defendant Square D. Company. On April 13, 1971 at Rochester, New York, pursuant to an order of Special Term, discovery and inspection of the switch has been had by all parties in the presence of their expert engineering representatives. X rays were taken of the switch. On June 8, 1972 plaintiffs served and filed a required statement of readiness. Now 33 months later defendant Square D Company moves for a second discovery and inspection of the switch to be produced at Asheville, North Carolina. Since no motion was made within the 20-day period following the filing of the note of issue and the statement of readiness, the right to conduct further pretrial procedures was waived (Warren v Vick Chem. Co., 37 AD2d 913). (Appeal from order of Monroe Special Term granting motion for discovery.) Present— Marsh, P. J., Moule, Simons, Del Vecchio and Witmer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 A.D.2d 999, 366 N.Y.S.2d 746, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-v-package-machinery-co-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack