Rose v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

884 N.E.2d 68, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1460
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 9, 2008·No. 2007-2448·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 07AP-472,173 Ohio App.3d 767, 2007-0hio-6184. Discretionary appeal not accepted. Motion for stay of jurisdictional consideration denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rose v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 884 N.E.2d 68, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1460 (Ohio 2008).

884 N.E.2d 68 (Rose v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Copeland v. Shoop
S.D. Ohio, 2022