Rose v. Newlywed Spice Craft Division

Missouri Court of Appeals

Rose v. Newlywed Spice Craft Division

91 S.W.3d 703, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 2371, 2002 WL 31752204

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 10, 2002·No. ED 81078·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Timothy Rose (employee) appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) denying him compensation for an injury he alleges he experienced while working at Newlywed Spice Craft Division, Newlyweds Foods (employer).

We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties and find no error of law. An extended opinion reciting the detañed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value or jurisprudential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the *704 reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Timothy Rose (employee) appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) denying him compensation for an injury he alleges he experienced while working at Newlywed Spice Craft Division, Newlyweds Foods (employer).

We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties and find no error of law. An extended opinion reciting the detañed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value or jurisprudential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the *704 reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Rose v. Newlywed Spice Craft Division, 91 S.W.3d 703, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 2371, 2002 WL 31752204 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

91 S.W.3d 703 (Rose v. Newlywed Spice Craft Division) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.