Rose v. Muldoon
This text of 277 A.D.2d 1147 (Rose v. Muldoon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal and other injuries, as the result of a collision on the highway between a passenger automobile and a tractor-trailer, in which there is a counterclaim for similar relief, judgment, entered in favor of plaintiff, after trial by the court without a jury, reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The judgment is against the weight of the evidence. Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur; [1148]*1148Nolan, P. J., and Johnston, J., dissent and vote to affirm on the ground that the testimony and exhibits presented an issue of fact, and that the trial judge, on sufficient evidence, properly resolved that issue in favor of the plaintiff. [See Muldoon v. A. F. D., Inc., ante, p. 1144.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
277 A.D.2d 1147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-v-muldoon-nyappdiv-1950.