Rose v. Mortimer

17 Ill. 475
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedJune 15, 1856
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 17 Ill. 475 (Rose v. Mortimer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rose v. Mortimer, 17 Ill. 475 (Ill. 1856).

Opinion

Catón, J.

This was an action on a promissory note, by an assignee, to which the defendant filed a plea of the general issue. Under this plea the defendant, on the trial, offered to prove a failure of consideration, which the court ruled out, and which is the decision complained of.

The court decided óorrectly. The right to defend a promissory note for a want, or failure, or partial failure of consideration, is conferred by the 10th section of chapter 73, R. S., and that statute requires the defence to be pleaded. There is hardly a volume of our reports, in which cases are not found, where this court has passed upon the sufficiency of such special pleas ; but I do not find that it has before been attempted to set up the defence under the general issue. The statute does.not authorize it, and the court properly ruled out the defence' offered.

The judgment must be affirmed. '

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Columbia Heating Co. v. O'Halloran
144 Ill. App. 74 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1908)
Dickinson v. Citizens National Bank of Franklin, Indiana
70 Ill. App. 405 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1897)
Sheldon v. Lewis
97 Ill. 640 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1881)
Wilson v. King
83 Ill. 232 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1876)
Patterson v. Gile
1 Colo. 200 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1870)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 Ill. 475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-v-mortimer-ill-1856.