Rose v. Montgomery

214 A.D. 738

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The learned trial court erred in its charge to the jury relating to punitive damages. (Distin v. Rose, 69 N. Y. 122; Willard v. Press Publishing Co., 52 App. Div. 448.) There was error also in the charge that the jury might consider the justification pleaded by way of defense in determining whether the defendant uttered the slander. In view of the closeness of the issue on the question of fact, we do not think these errors can be overlooked. Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Kelby, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rose v. Montgomery, 214 A.D. 738 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).

214 A.D. 738 (Rose v. Montgomery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Distin v. . Rose
69 N.Y. 122 (New York Court of Appeals, 1877)
Willard v. Press Publishing Co.
52 A.D. 448 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)