Rose v. Montgomery

214 A.D. 738

This text of 214 A.D. 738 (Rose v. Montgomery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rose v. Montgomery, 214 A.D. 738 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The learned trial court erred in its charge to the jury relating to punitive damages. (Distin v. Rose, 69 N. Y. 122; Willard v. Press Publishing Co., 52 App. Div. 448.) There was error also in the charge that the jury might consider the justification pleaded by way of defense in determining whether the defendant uttered the slander. In view of the closeness of the issue on the question of fact, we do not think these errors can be overlooked. Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Kelby, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Distin v. . Rose
69 N.Y. 122 (New York Court of Appeals, 1877)
Willard v. Press Publishing Co.
52 A.D. 448 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
214 A.D. 738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-v-montgomery-nyappdiv-1925.