Home/Court of Appeals of Kentucky/Rose v. Monarch

Rose v. Monarch

151 S.W. 19, 151 Ky. 9, 1912 Ky. LEXIS 740
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rose v. Monarch. Read the opinion of the Court — 150 Ky. 129 →
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided December 3, 1912·Published

Opinion

Response to Petition for Rehearing by

Chief Justice Hobson.

The facts of the case of Hallis v. Watson were materially different from the facts of this ease. The circuit court has a discretion in ruling on motions for continuance and we cannot say his discretion was abused here.

Petition overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rose v. Monarch, 151 S.W. 19, 151 Ky. 9, 1912 Ky. LEXIS 740 (Ky. Ct. App. 1912).

151 S.W. 19 (Rose v. Monarch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.