Rose v. Metro North Commuter Railroad

120 A.D.2d 725, 502 N.Y.S.2d 660, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56846
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rose v. Metro North Commuter Railroad. Read the opinion of the Court — 143 A.D.2d 993

Opinion

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Village/Town of Mt. Kisco appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Marbach, J.), entered July 2, 1985, as vacated a prior order of the same court, entered May 22, 1985 dismissing the action against it for failure to comply with General Municipal Law § 50-h (5).

Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, Special Term acted correctly in vacating its prior order. Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Niehoff, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rose v. Metro North Commuter Railroad, 120 A.D.2d 725, 502 N.Y.S.2d 660, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56846 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

120 A.D.2d 725 (Rose v. Metro North Commuter Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 50
New York GMU § 50