Rose v. Metro North Commuter Railroad

541 N.E.2d 423, 74 N.Y.2d 713, 543 N.Y.S.2d 394, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 820
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 15, 1989
StatusPublished

This text of 541 N.E.2d 423 (Rose v. Metro North Commuter Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rose v. Metro North Commuter Railroad, 541 N.E.2d 423, 74 N.Y.2d 713, 543 N.Y.S.2d 394, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 820 (N.Y. 1989).

Opinion

Motion for reargument denied. Movant failed to comply with section 500.11 (d) (1) (iv) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11 [d] [1] [iv]) when movant previously sought leave to appeal. [See, 73 NY2d 994.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
541 N.E.2d 423, 74 N.Y.2d 713, 543 N.Y.S.2d 394, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-v-metro-north-commuter-railroad-ny-1989.