Rose v. Lelande

119 P. 532, 17 Cal. App. 308
California Court of Appeal·Decided October 24, 1911·No. Civ. No. 1070.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

This application must be denied for two reasons: First, there is no duty devolving by law upon the clerk to certify or attest the transcript containing the reporter's notes, or the papers desired to be included therein, not included in the judgment-roll. Second, the notice of appeal is from an order of court setting aside a default. This is not an appealable order.

The writ is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rose v. Lelande, 119 P. 532, 17 Cal. App. 308 (Cal. Ct. App. 1911).

119 P. 532 (Rose v. Lelande) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vázquez-Prada v. King Vda. de Dooley
58 P.R. Dec. 333 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1941)
Hughson v. Superior Court
8 P.2d 227 (California Court of Appeal, 1932)
Mercantile Banking Co. v. Hernandez
4 P.2d 277 (California Court of Appeal, 1931)
Omaha Structural Steel Works v. Lemon
164 P. 1011 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1917)