Rose v. Lelande

California Court of Appeal

Rose v. Lelande

17 Cal. App. 308

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedOctober 24, 1911

DocketCiv. No. 1070

StatusPublished

This text of 17 Cal. App. 308 (Rose v. Lelande) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rose v. Lelande, 17 Cal. App. 308 (Cal. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

This application must be denied for two reasons: First, there is no duty devolving by law upon the clerk to certify or attest the transcript containing the reporter’s notes, or the papers desired to be included therein, not included in the judgment-roll. Second, the notice of appeal is from an order of court setting aside a default. This is not an appealable order.

The writ is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

This application must be denied for two reasons: First, there is no duty devolving by law upon the clerk to certify or attest the transcript containing the reporter’s notes, or the papers desired to be included therein, not included in the judgment-roll. Second, the notice of appeal is from an order of court setting aside a default. This is not an appealable order.

The writ is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 Cal. App. 308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-v-lelande-calctapp-1911.