Rose v. Lafayette Parish Consolidated Government

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Rose v. Lafayette Parish Consolidated Government

904 So. 2d 926, 5 La.App. 3 Cir. 30, 2005 La. App. LEXIS 1473, 2005 WL 1283473

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided June 1, 2005·No. No. CA 05-30·Published

Opinion

GENOVESE, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the companion and consolidated case of Larry M. Bailey, et al v. City of Lafayette, 05-29 (La.App. 3 Cir. 6/1/05), 904 So.2d 922, 2005 WL 1283471, the judgment of the trial court granting the Plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment and denying Defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability is affirmed. Costs of this appeal are assessed against the DefendanL-Appellant, City of Lafayette (Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GENOVESE, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the companion and consolidated case of Larry M. Bailey, et al v. City of Lafayette, 05-29 (La.App. 3 Cir. 6/1/05), 904 So.2d 922, 2005 WL 1283471, the judgment of the trial court granting the Plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment and denying Defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability is affirmed. Costs of this appeal are assessed against the DefendanL-Appellant, City of Lafayette (Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government).

AFFIRMED.

Rose v. Lafayette Parish Consolidated Government, 904 So. 2d 926, 5 La.App. 3 Cir. 30, 2005 La. App. LEXIS 1473, 2005 WL 1283473 (La. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

904 So. 2d 926 (Rose v. Lafayette Parish Consolidated Government) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related