Rose v. Kennedy
20 F. Cas. 1188, 1 Cranch 29
This text of 20 F. Cas. 1188 (Rose v. Kennedy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rose v. Kennedy, 20 F. Cas. 1188, 1 Cranch 29 (circtddc 1801).
Opinion
contra. The paper is not in itself evidence that the oath, as prescribed, was taken. For when a magistrate undertakes to certify how he has administered an oath, the jury cannot, without proof, presume any thing not certified. They cannot say that he administered the oath in any other form than he has certified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
20 F. Cas. 1188, 1 Cranch 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-v-kennedy-circtddc-1801.