Rose v. Harrison

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Rose v. Harrison

117 N.E. 313, 228 Mass. 261, 1917 Mass. LEXIS 1210

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedOctober 19, 1917

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 117 N.E. 313 (Rose v. Harrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rose v. Harrison, 117 N.E. 313, 228 Mass. 261, 1917 Mass. LEXIS 1210 (Mass. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

This record consists of a “petition to vacate judgment,” the order of notice thereon, the date of filing in the Municipal Court, the date of entry in the Superior Court, a statement that the petition was “denied after hearing,” and the plaintiff’s appeal. The record is barren of any suggestion of a question of law. Therefore there is nothing to be considered. Cobb v. Hale, 172 Mass. 387.

The appeal is frivolous. The denial of the petition is affirmed with double costs under the statute.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

This record consists of a “petition to vacate judgment,” the order of notice thereon, the date of filing in the Municipal Court, the date of entry in the Superior Court, a statement that the petition was “denied after hearing,” and the plaintiff’s appeal. The record is barren of any suggestion of a question of law. Therefore there is nothing to be considered. Cobb v. Hale, 172 Mass. 387.

The appeal is frivolous. The denial of the petition is affirmed with double costs under the statute.

So ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

117 N.E. 313, 228 Mass. 261, 1917 Mass. LEXIS 1210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-v-harrison-mass-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack