Rose v. Harrison

117 N.E. 313, 228 Mass. 261, 1917 Mass. LEXIS 1210
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 19, 1917·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

This record consists of a “petition to vacate judgment,” the order of notice thereon, the date of filing in the Municipal Court, the date of entry in the Superior Court, a statement that the petition was “denied after hearing,” and the plaintiff’s appeal. The record is barren of any suggestion of a question of law. Therefore there is nothing to be considered. Cobb v. Hale, 172 Mass. 387.

The appeal is frivolous. The denial of the petition is affirmed with double costs under the statute.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rose v. Harrison, 117 N.E. 313, 228 Mass. 261, 1917 Mass. LEXIS 1210 (Mass. 1917).

117 N.E. 313 (Rose v. Harrison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matos v. Trinity Constr. Co.
320 N.E.2d 837 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1974)
Zeo v. Holzer
185 N.E.2d 926 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1962)
Fairbanks v. Beard
141 N.E. 590 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1923)
Norton v. Musterole Co.
235 Mass. 587 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1920)