Rose v. Hamilton

Court of Chancery of South Carolina

Rose v. Hamilton

1 S.C. Eq. 137

CourtCourt of Chancery of South Carolina

DecidedJune 15, 1787

StatusPublished

This text of 1 S.C. Eq. 137 (Rose v. Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rose v. Hamilton, 1 S.C. Eq. 137 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1787).

Pincite

Opinion

On reading this bilí, and on some contention arising relative to entering into the merits thereof, the court ruled, that upon an application for an injunction, the merits may be entered into without answer filedj but the adverse solicitor is in his opposition to confine himself to the allegations in the bill, and cannot produce any extraneous or foreign matter in proof, until the answer be brought in. The merits of this case being argued by the solicitors, Mr. Drayton and Mr. Read, it w'as decreed ib,at the bill be dismissed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On reading this bilí, and on some contention arising relative to entering into the merits thereof, the court ruled, that upon an application for an injunction, the merits may be entered into without answer filedj but the adverse solicitor is in his opposition to confine himself to the allegations in the bill, and cannot produce any extraneous or foreign matter in proof, until the answer be brought in. The merits of this case being argued by the solicitors, Mr. Drayton and Mr. Read, it w'as decreed ib,at the bill be dismissed with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 S.C. Eq. 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-v-hamilton-ctchansc-1787.