Rose v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company
162 N.E. 522, 248 N.Y. 556, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1354
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rose v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, 162 N.E. 522, 248 N.Y. 556, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1354 (N.Y. 1928).
162 N.E. 522 (Rose v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.