Rose v. Gaglioti
This text of 49 Fla. Supp. 2d 6 (Rose v. Gaglioti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
THIS CAUSE having come before this Court on a Motion for Appellate Attorneys Fees and Costs filed on behalf of Appellant, [7]*7STEFAN ROSE, M.D. and the Court having reviewed the same as well as the applicable law, it is hereby:
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:
The said Motion be and the same is hereby GRANTED and the Court’s previous May 6, 1991, Order denying the same is hereby vacated based upon the following findings:
1. In its opinion dated March 8, 1991, this Court held appellant to be the prevailing party for purposes of awarding attorneys fees pursuant to Florida Statute § 83.49(3)(c) (1989).
2. Thereafter, appellant timely filed his motion for appellate attorneys fees and costs pursuant to Florida Statute § 59.46 (1989).1 This statute absolutely entitles appellant to appellate attorneys fees and costs absent any explicit legislative intent to the contrary in § 83.49(3)(c) (1989). We find that there is no such legislative intent in § 83.49(3)(c) to deny appellant his appellate attorneys fees and costs.
Accordingly, this cause is remanded to the trial court for a determination of the amount of attorneys fees and costs to be awarded to appellant for both the trial and appeal of this cause.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
49 Fla. Supp. 2d 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-v-gaglioti-flacirct-1991.