Rose v. Employment Division

671 P.2d 1208, 65 Or. App. 694, 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 4099
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided November 23, 1983·No. 83-AB-367; CA A27657·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In Bremer v. Employment Division, 47 Or App 1131, 1137, 615 P2d 1170 (1980), we said:

“* * * Before the Board may hold that the claimant had failed to consider ‘reasonable alternatives’ for leaving work, it must be found that there were such alternatives. Without such a finding, the Board’s conclusion is not supported by its own findings.”

The order in this case is identically defective.

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rose v. Employment Division, 671 P.2d 1208, 65 Or. App. 694, 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 4099 (Or. Ct. App. 1983).

671 P.2d 1208 (Rose v. Employment Division) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bremer v. Employment Division
615 P.2d 1170 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1980)