Rose v. Employment Division
671 P.2d 1208, 65 Or. App. 694, 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 4099
This text of 671 P.2d 1208 (Rose v. Employment Division) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rose v. Employment Division, 671 P.2d 1208, 65 Or. App. 694, 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 4099 (Or. Ct. App. 1983).
Opinion
In Bremer v. Employment Division, 47 Or App 1131, 1137, 615 P2d 1170 (1980), we said:
“* * * Before the Board may hold that the claimant had failed to consider ‘reasonable alternatives’ for leaving work, it must be found that there were such alternatives. Without such a finding, the Board’s conclusion is not supported by its own findings.”
The order in this case is identically defective.
Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bremer v. Employment Division
615 P.2d 1170 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1980)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
671 P.2d 1208, 65 Or. App. 694, 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 4099, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-v-employment-division-orctapp-1983.