Rose v. De-Lury
This text of 222 A.D.2d 681 (Rose v. De-Lury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent to issue an order determining the petitioner’s motion pursuant to CPL article 440 to vacate a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered October 2, 1992, in the matter entitled People v William Rose, Kings County Indictment No. 8579/91.
Motion by the respondent to dismiss the proceeding.
Upon the petition and papers filed in support of the proceeding, and the papers filed in opposition thereto and in support of the motion, it is
Ordered that the motion is granted; and it is further,
Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.
The petitioner’s motion was decided by order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 14, 1994. Hence, the proceeding is academic. Copertino, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
222 A.D.2d 681, 636 N.Y.S.2d 655, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13961, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-v-de-lury-nyappdiv-1995.