Rose v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.
448 So. 2d 1205, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12934
Opinion
Affirmed. See Wolf v. Buchman, 425 So.2d 182 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Sections 679.9-206, 679.9-316 Florida Statutes (1981); Compare: Cortina v. Cortina, 98 So.2d 334, 335 (Fla.1957).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rose v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., 448 So. 2d 1205, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12934 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).
448 So. 2d 1205 (Rose v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wolf v. Buchman
425 So. 2d 182 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Cortina v. Cortina
98 So. 2d 334 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)