Rose v. Brownlee
This text of 2 F.2d 1013 (Rose v. Brownlee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the concurring decisions of the three tribunals of the Patent Office, appellee's were awarded priority of invention over appellant Rose. The invention consists of heating gas to be used with oxygen in metal cutting and welding. Appellant is the junior party by over three years. This point, however, is of little importance, since the case turns upon the question of originality of invention. Only issues of fact are involved, and from an examination of the record we find no reason to disturb the findings of the various tribunals of the Patent Office. The decision of the Commissioner of Patents is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 F.2d 1013, 55 App. D.C. 398, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-v-brownlee-cadc-1924.