Rose v. Bailey

New York Court of Appeals

Rose v. Bailey

271 N.E.2d 230, 28 N.Y.2d 857, 322 N.Y.S.2d 252, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1375

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 21, 1971

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 271 N.E.2d 230 (Rose v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rose v. Bailey, 271 N.E.2d 230, 28 N.Y.2d 857, 322 N.Y.S.2d 252, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1375 (N.Y. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, without costs. Although the order of the Appellate Division is final insofar as it affirms the dismissal of plaintiffs-appellants ’ causes of action for personal injury and for loss of consortium—since said causes of action are treated as severed (see Sirlin Plumbing Co. v. Maple Hill Homes, 20 N Y 2d 401) —an appeal does not lie as of right. The dissent with respect to that portion of the order which is final is not on a “ question of law ’ ’ in favor of appellants (CPLR 5601, subd. [a], par. [i]), and the modification with respect to the nonfinal portion of said order does not come within CPLR 5601 (subd. [a], par. [iii]), in that it is not substantial, is not within the power of the Court of Appeals to review and does not aggrieve appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, without costs. Although the order of the Appellate Division is final insofar as it affirms the dismissal of plaintiffs-appellants ’ causes of action for personal injury and for loss of consortium—since said causes of action are treated as severed (see Sirlin Plumbing Co. v. Maple Hill Homes, 20 N Y 2d 401) —an appeal does not lie as of right. The dissent with respect to that portion of the order which is final is not on a “ question of law ’ ’ in favor of appellants (CPLR 5601, subd. [a], par. [i]), and the modification with respect to the nonfinal portion of said order does not come within CPLR 5601 (subd. [a], par. [iii]), in that it is not substantial, is not within the power of the Court of Appeals to review and does not aggrieve appellants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 N.E.2d 230, 28 N.Y.2d 857, 322 N.Y.S.2d 252, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-v-bailey-ny-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack