Rose v. Axelrod

91 A.D.2d 1026, 458 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16342

This text of 91 A.D.2d 1026 (Rose v. Axelrod) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rose v. Axelrod, 91 A.D.2d 1026, 458 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16342 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

— Proceedings pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review two [1027]*1027determinations of the respondents dated June 6, 1980 and October 8, 1981, respectively, which found that petitioners had violated certain sections of the Public Health Law and corresponding regulations and imposed fines. Determinations confirmed and proceedings dismissed, on the merits, without costs or disbursements. The determinations under review are supported by substantial evidence (see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176). We have not considered the material submitted by petitioners which is dehors the record made before the respondents (see Matter of Levine v New York State Liq. Auth., 23 NY2d 863). Gibbons, J. P., Thompson, Bracken and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Levine v. New York State Liquor Authority
245 N.E.2d 804 (New York Court of Appeals, 1969)
300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human Rights
379 N.E.2d 1183 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 A.D.2d 1026, 458 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-v-axelrod-nyappdiv-1983.