Rose v. Adams

District Court, W.D. Virginia·Decided December 16, 2022·No. 7:20-cv-00609·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION

THOMAS ALEXANDER ROSE, ) Plaintiff, ) Civil Action No. 7:20cv00609 ) v. ) FINDINGS OF FACT AND ) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW OFFICER ADAMS, et al., ) Defendants. ) By: Hon. Pamela Meade Sargent ) United States Magistrate Judge

The pro se plaintiff, Thomas Alexander Rose, (“Rose”), who previously was incarcerated at River North Correctional Center, (“River North”), brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against the defendants, Virginia Department of Corrections, (“VDOC”), Correctional Officers Adams, (“Adams”), and E. Paisely, (“Paisley”),1 and Sgt. J. Robinson, a VDOC canine officer, (“Robinson”). In his Complaint, Rose alleges that the defendants violated his Eighth Amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment by using excessive force against him on August 7, 2020. (Docket Item No. 1, (“Complaint.”)) In particular, Rose claims that he was the victim of an attack by another inmate; nonetheless, the defendants used excessive force against him. Specifically, Rose claims that Adams shot him in his back, Paisley used pepper spray against him, and Robinson allowed his canine to attack. Based on the consent of the parties, the case was transferred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). A bench trial was held on July 12, 2022. For the reasons discussed below, I will enter judgment in favor of the defendants.

1 The Complaint and court’s docket incorrectly spell the defendant’s name as “Paisely” and “Pasely.” I. Facts

At trial, Rose testified that he was a VDOC inmate housed at River North on August 7, 2020, when he was attacked by another inmate, Dodson. Rose said that he and Dodson were workout partners. Five minutes before Dodson attacked him, Rose said, Rose told Dodson that he needed to apologize to another inmate with whom he was involved in an altercation on August 5, 2020. Rose said he told Dodson that, if Dodson did not apologize, he would not continue to work out with him. Rose said that he was talking with another inmate when Dodson picked up a trash can and threw the trash can at him. Rose said that he took Dodson down and restrained him.

Rose said he then was shot in the back, so he slid with Dodson under “the cage.” During this time, Rose claimed that he simply was restraining Dodson, but not fighting with him. Rose said that Paisley entered the pod and sprayed him with mace. Next, he said he felt a dog attack him. Rose said he then asked the canine officer to “get this damn dog off me.” By this time, Rose said that Dodson had slid away from him. Rose said that the canine officer told him to turn over, which he did, and the canine officer removed the dog from him.

Rose testified that he knew that defendant Adams was the “gun man” in the Control Booth that day, but he admitted that he did not know who shot him in the back. Rose said that oleoresin capsicum, (“OC”), pepper spray came out of what hit him in the back. He said that Dodson continued to struggle with him as he held him and slid him toward the microwave. Rose said that there was no warning before he was shot in the back. He also said that he knew the officer in the Control Booth did not know who started the fight. Rose said Paisley gave him no command or instruction before he sprayed him with mace in the face from two feet away. Rose said that he was not fighting with Dodson when he was sprayed, but, rather, simply was trying to restrain Dodson. Rose admitted that he still was on top of Dodson when the dog first bit him. He said that Dodson still was struggling when Sergeant Evans snatched Dodson out from under him. Rose said that, if the canine officer gave him any instructions, he did not hear him do so. Rose said that he could not see anything at this point because he had blood on his face and tears in his eyes. Rose said that when Robinson told him to turn over and get down, he did so, and Robinson disengaged with the dog.

Rose said that he suffered 40 to 50 lacerations from where the dog bit him, which had left him with scar tissue. “I was mauled,” he said. A Nursing Assessment Of Offender Injuries form, dated August 7, 2020, was admitted into evidence as Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 1. (Docket Item No. 65-1.) The Assessment documented that Rose suffered numerous lacerations to the front and back of his right leg in the incident. Photographs of Rose’s injuries were admitted into evidence as Plaintiff’s Exhibit Nos. 2-5, 7. (Docket Item Nos. 65-2, 65-3, 65-4, 65-5, 65-7.) A photograph of Rose’s bloody sock and shoe was admitted into evidence as Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 6. (Docket Item No. 65-6.)

Rose said that his wounds healed within a month and left scars on his leg. Until his wounds healed, he said that he had to wrap the wounds up when he showered. He said that, since the injury to his leg, the bottoms of his feet go numb, and his foot and leg swell. Rose said that, when he rubs the Achilles tendon area on his leg, it causes a sharp pain and tingling feeling. He said that he was prescribed Tylenol and Motrin for his pain. A copy of Rose’s VDOC medical records were admitted into evidence as Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 8, (Docket Item No. 65-8). Rose testified that he did not receive a disciplinary infraction over the events of August 7, 2020. He said that officers told him that, after reviewing the video recording of the incident, they determined that Dodson was the aggressor and not Rose.

On cross-examination, Rose stated that all inmates are given a book during orientation at River North, and that book instructs the inmate to get on the floor when a buzzer goes off. Rose said that, as an inmate, he knew that, whenever there is an altercation, you get down because you could be hit with a round. Rose agreed that, when the buzzer goes off, an inmate should not continue fighting. Nonetheless, Rose said, that, if you were in a fight, you had to protect yourself. Rose also conceded that an inmate was not supposed to restrain another inmate.

Rose said that Dodson was offended when he told him to apologize to the other inmate. Because of that, Rose said that he continued to watch Dodson as he walked away from him. Rose said that he kept Dodson in his peripheral vision because he did not know what he was going to do. Rose stated that, after Dodson threw the trash can at him, he tackled Dodson to the ground. Rose admitted that he knew that the gun man in the Control Room would shoot with any altercation. Rose also stated that he was a trained boxer.

Rose stated that he considered Dodson a friend, but he thought Dodson was mentally disturbed because Dodson previously had thrown his cellmate’s television out of the cell.

Video recordings of the incident were admitted into evidence at Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 9. These video recordings were played for Rose’s review during his cross-examination. Based on his review of the recording, Rose admitted that the video showed that Dodson picked up a trash can and threw it at him at 1:30:11 p.m. At 1:30:12, Dodson came toward Rose with his hands closed, and at 1:30:13, Rose tackled Dodson to the floor. Rose said that he still was holding Dodson when he was hit in the back by the OC round at 1:30:26 on the video. He admitted that he did not release Dodson when he was hit by the round, but, rather, he drove Dodson underneath the microwave table at 1:30:31 on the recording. Rose said that he drove Dodson under the microwave table to “get[] out of the line of fire.” Rose said that he knew that “whenever two guys lock up, you are going to get shot if you don’t get out of the way.” Rose admitted that he did not release Dodson and simply walk away.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rose v. Adams, (W.D. Va. 2022).

Rose v. Adams (Rose v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilkins v. Gaddy
559 U.S. 34 (Supreme Court, 2010)
Whitley v. Albers
475 U.S. 312 (Supreme Court, 1986)
Wilson v. Seiter
501 U.S. 294 (Supreme Court, 1991)
Hudson v. McMillian
503 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1992)
Williams v. Benjamin
77 F.3d 756 (Fourth Circuit, 1996)
Johnson v. Glick
481 F.2d 1028 (Second Circuit, 1973)