Rose Spice, Inc. v. S & J Wholesale Toiletries & Cosmetic Sales, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rose Spice, Inc. v. S & J Wholesale Toiletries & Cosmetic Sales, Inc.

210 A.D.2d 391, 620 N.Y.S.2d 981, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12956

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 19, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 210 A.D.2d 391 (Rose Spice, Inc. v. S & J Wholesale Toiletries & Cosmetic Sales, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rose Spice, Inc. v. S & J Wholesale Toiletries & Cosmetic Sales, Inc., 210 A.D.2d 391, 620 N.Y.S.2d 981, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12956 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for a fraudulent conveyance, the defendant Zahn Associates, Inc., appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Werner, J.), dated March 11, 1993, as denied those branches of its motion which were to dismiss the plaintiff’s first, second, and fourth causes of action insofar as they are asserted against it, and the plaintiff cross-appeals from so much of the same order as granted those branches of the motion of Zahn Associates, Inc., which were to dismiss the third and sixth causes of action insofar as they are asserted against it.

[392]*392Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, for reasons stated by Justice Werner at the Supreme Court. Sullivan, J. P., Lawrence, Ritter and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for a fraudulent conveyance, the defendant Zahn Associates, Inc., appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Werner, J.), dated March 11, 1993, as denied those branches of its motion which were to dismiss the plaintiff’s first, second, and fourth causes of action insofar as they are asserted against it, and the plaintiff cross-appeals from so much of the same order as granted those branches of the motion of Zahn Associates, Inc., which were to dismiss the third and sixth causes of action insofar as they are asserted against it.

[392]*392Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, for reasons stated by Justice Werner at the Supreme Court. Sullivan, J. P., Lawrence, Ritter and Joy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

210 A.D.2d 391, 620 N.Y.S.2d 981, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-spice-inc-v-s-j-wholesale-toiletries-cosmetic-sales-inc-nyappdiv-1994.