Rose Roller & Howilo Real Estate Co. v. City of New York
This text of 250 A.D. 778 (Rose Roller & Howilo Real Estate Co. v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action under article 15 of the Real Property Law, to compel the determination of a claim to real property, the parcel affected being a triangular gore at the southeast corner of Sixteenth avenue and Forty-fourth street, Brooklyn, N. Y. Judgment for the defendant unanimously affirmed, with costs. The plaintiffs did not establish title in themselves. (Stirnweis v. Cacioppo, 258 N. Y. 68; Vanderveer Crossings v. Rapalje, 133 App. Div. 203; D’Anna v. City of New York, 246 id. 753; Real Prop. Law, §§ 500, 501, subd. 1.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
250 A.D. 778, 294 N.Y.S. 185, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8966, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-roller-howilo-real-estate-co-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1937.