ROSE PARK PLACE, INC. v. STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

ROSE PARK PLACE, INC. v. STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 2, 2014·No. CA 13-01251·Published

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

327 CA 13-01251 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND SCONIERS, JJ.

ROSE PARK PLACE, INC., COLUMN DEVELOPMENT, INC., E.L. FREEMAN ROAD, LLC, FRED HANANIA, MARY JO LOBRUTTO AND ROGER PASQUARELLA, CLAIMANTS-RESPONDENTS,

V ORDER

STATE OF NEW YORK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (CLAIM NO. 114089.) (APPEAL NO. 2.)

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (OWEN DEMUTH OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MAGAVERN MAGAVERN GRIMM LLP, BUFFALO (EDWARD J. MARKARIAN OF COUNSEL), FOR CLAIMANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (Michael E. Hudson, J.), entered April 30, 2013. The order denied the motion of defendant to vacate a judgment entered September 14, 2012.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs (see Ciesinski v Town of Aurora, 202 AD2d 984, 984).

Entered: May 2, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

327 CA 13-01251 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND SCONIERS, JJ.

ROSE PARK PLACE, INC., COLUMN DEVELOPMENT, INC., E.L. FREEMAN ROAD, LLC, FRED HANANIA, MARY JO LOBRUTTO AND ROGER PASQUARELLA, CLAIMANTS-RESPONDENTS,

V ORDER

STATE OF NEW YORK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (CLAIM NO. 114089.) (APPEAL NO. 2.)

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (OWEN DEMUTH OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MAGAVERN MAGAVERN GRIMM LLP, BUFFALO (EDWARD J. MARKARIAN OF COUNSEL), FOR CLAIMANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (Michael E. Hudson, J.), entered April 30, 2013. The order denied the motion of defendant to vacate a judgment entered September 14, 2012.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs (see Ciesinski v Town of Aurora, 202 AD2d 984, 984).

Entered: May 2, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

ROSE PARK PLACE, INC. v. STATE OF NEW YORK, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

ROSE PARK PLACE, INC. v. STATE OF NEW YORK (ROSE PARK PLACE, INC. v. STATE OF NEW YORK) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related