Rose Mezu v. Morgan State University

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rose Mezu v. Morgan State University. Read the opinion of the Court — 495 F. App'x 286
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 11, 2015·No. 14-1911·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1911

ROSE URE MEZU,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY; ARMADA W. GRANT, in her personal capacity and as Director, Human Resources/Payroll for Morgan State University; DOLAN HUBBARD, in his personal capacity and as Chair, Department of English and Language Arts, Morgan State University,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-02855-WMN; 1:11-cv-03072-WMN)

Submitted: August 27, 2015 Decided: September 11, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

C. Valerie Ibe, LAW OFFICES OF C. VALERIE IBE, Pikesville, Maryland, for Appellant. Brian E. Frosh, Attorney General of Maryland, Thomas Faulk, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Rose Ure Mezu appeals the district court’s judgment and its

order denying her Fed. R. Civ. P. 50 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 59

motions, after a jury found in Defendants’ favor on Mezu’s

claims alleging retaliation, in violation of Title VII of the

Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to

2000e-17 (2012), and retaliation in violation of, and

interference with her rights guaranteed by, the Family and

Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2654 (2012). We have

considered the parties’ arguments and have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the

district court’s judgment and order. Mezu v. Morgan State

Univ., Nos. 1:09-cv-02855-WMN; 1:11-cv-03072-WMN (D. Md. filed

Jun. 13, 2014, entered Jun. 23, 2014; Aug. 21, 2014. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rose Mezu v. Morgan State University, (4th Cir. 2015).

Rose Mezu v. Morgan State University (Rose Mezu v. Morgan State University) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 2601-2654
29 U.S.C. § 2601-2654
Definitions
42 U.S.C. § 2000e
§ 2601
29 U.S.C. § 2601