ROSE MARIE BATTAGLIA v. STATE ATTORNEY OF THE NINETEENTH CIRCUIT and BERNARD ROMERO
This text of ROSE MARIE BATTAGLIA v. STATE ATTORNEY OF THE NINETEENTH CIRCUIT and BERNARD ROMERO (ROSE MARIE BATTAGLIA v. STATE ATTORNEY OF THE NINETEENTH CIRCUIT and BERNARD ROMERO) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
ROSE MARIE BATTAGLIA, Appellant,
v.
STATE ATTORNEY OF THE NINETEENTH CIRCUIT, and BERNARD ROMERO, Appellees.
No. 4D20-1667
[May 13, 2021]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Barbara W. Bronis, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562018CA002007AXXXHC.
Diana L. Martin of Cohen Milstein Sellers Toll PLLC, Palm Beach Gardens, for appellant.
Daniel S. Weinger, Daniel J. Santaniello, and Chris Moore of Luks, Santaniello, Petrillo & Cohen, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee Bernard Romero.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
MAY, KUNTZ and ARTAU, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ROSE MARIE BATTAGLIA v. STATE ATTORNEY OF THE NINETEENTH CIRCUIT and BERNARD ROMERO, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-marie-battaglia-v-state-attorney-of-the-nineteenth-circuit-and-fladistctapp-2021.