ROSE FINANCIAL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. SOUTH BAY HOLDING LLC

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 14, 2022
Docket21-2306
StatusPublished

This text of ROSE FINANCIAL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. SOUTH BAY HOLDING LLC (ROSE FINANCIAL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. SOUTH BAY HOLDING LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
ROSE FINANCIAL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. SOUTH BAY HOLDING LLC, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed December 14, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

Nos. 3D21-122 & 3D21-2306 Lower Tribunal No. 18-35014 ________________

Rose Financial Limited Partnership, et al., Appellants,

vs.

South Bay Holding LLC, et al., Appellees.

Appeals from non-final orders from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Michael A. Hanzman, Judge.

Arnaldo Velez, P.A., and Arnaldo Velez; Lewis Baach Kaufmann Middlemiss PLLC, and Eric L. Lewis and Elizabeth M. Velez (New York, NY), and Mark J. Leimkuhler and Chiara Spector-Naranjo, (Washington, D.C.), for appellants.

Akerman LLP, and Robert I. Chaskes and Noelle P. Pankey, for appellees Amicorp Trustees (New Zealand) Limited, Amicorp (Barbados) Limited, Amicorp Mexico S.A. de C.V. Sofom Enr., Amicorp (BVI) Trustees Limited, Amicorp Curaçao B.V., Amicorp Management Limited and Amicorp New Zealand Limited ; White & Case LLP, and James N. Robinson, Maria J. Beguiristain, Zachary B. Dickens, and Andrew K. Gershenfeld, for appellees SGG Management (Curaçao), N.V. & SGG Management (BVI) Ltd.; Mayer Brown LLP, and Mark G. Hanchet, Robert W. Hamburg, and Victoria D. Whitney, (New York, NY); Stumphauzer Foslid Sloman Ross & Kolaya, PLLC, and Ian M. Ross, for appellee Banque Pictet & Cie SA.

Before LOGUE, LINDSEY, and MILLER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Banco de los Trabajadores v. Cortez Moreno, 237 So. 3d

1127, 1136 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (“We cannot read section 48.193(1)(a)'s dual

requirements—both that a defendant does an enumerated act in

Florida and that the cause of action arises from an enumerated act in

Florida—as authorizing the exercise of specific jurisdiction when the only tort

relied upon to confer such jurisdiction is a civil conspiracy to commit a tort,

and no element of the underlying tort is alleged to have occurred in Florida.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Banco De Los Trabajadores v. Cortez Moreno
237 So. 3d 1127 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
ROSE FINANCIAL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. SOUTH BAY HOLDING LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-financial-limited-partnership-v-south-bay-holding-llc-fladistctapp-2022.