Rose Fair, Inc. v. Northville Dock Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rose Fair, Inc. v. Northville Dock Corp.

17 A.D.2d 664, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8523

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 11, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 17 A.D.2d 664 (Rose Fair, Inc. v. Northville Dock Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rose Fair, Inc. v. Northville Dock Corp., 17 A.D.2d 664, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8523 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by appellants to delete certain papers from the record on an appeal from part of an order dated April 12, 1962. Motion granted to the extent of granting leave to appellants to dispense with the printing of all papers other than those relating to the two portions of the order from which they appeal, on condition that all the original papers recited in the order and used in the court below, be submitted on the argument of the appeal. This disposition is without prejudice to a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it was not timely taken, if respondents be so advised. Motion by appellants for a stay denied. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by appellants to delete certain papers from the record on an appeal from part of an order dated April 12, 1962. Motion granted to the extent of granting leave to appellants to dispense with the printing of all papers other than those relating to the two portions of the order from which they appeal, on condition that all the original papers recited in the order and used in the court below, be submitted on the argument of the appeal. This disposition is without prejudice to a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it was not timely taken, if respondents be so advised. Motion by appellants for a stay denied. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 A.D.2d 664, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-fair-inc-v-northville-dock-corp-nyappdiv-1962.