Rose Container Corp. v. Lieberman

42 Misc. 2d 581, 248 N.Y.S.2d 501, 1964 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2065
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided February 20, 1964·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff’s action for return of security deposited under the terms of the lease between the parties is premature. Having breached the lease, plaintiff’s liability under its terms survived the date fixed in defendants ’ notice of termination and continues to the expiration date fixed in the lease (Rand v. Rifkin, 263 N. Y. 416; International Pub. v. Matchabelli, 260 N. Y. 451; Matter of Homann, 45 F. 2d 481).

Defendants are entitled to partial summary judgment for use and occupation from June 15 to August 30, 1962, as agreed to by the parties,, and for damages attributable to plaintiff’s failure to pay rent, in accordance with the terms of the lease for the period from ■ August 31, 1962 to the date when the counterclaim was ijaterposed.

The judgment and order should be reversed, with $10 costs to defendants, and plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment denied; defendants’ cross motion for partial summary judgment granted; plaintiff’s first cause of action dismissed and partial summary judgment granted to defendants on their first and third counterclaims as hereinafter indicated, matter remitted to court below for an assessment of damages in accordance herewith and balance of defendants’ counterclaim and plaintiff’s secqnd cause of action are severed.

Brows and Groat, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rose Container Corp. v. Lieberman, 42 Misc. 2d 581, 248 N.Y.S.2d 501, 1964 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2065 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

42 Misc. 2d 581 (Rose Container Corp. v. Lieberman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rose Container Corp. v. Lieberman
21 A.D.2d 913 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1964)