Rose Bros. v. Harrell
This text of 136 S.E. 142 (Rose Bros. v. Harrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
■ 1. In view of the rulings made in the decision of this case when it was first before this court (157 Ga. 640, 122 S. E. 240), and the judgment of reversal upon the ground that the court erred in directing a nonsuit, the court did not err in refusing a new trial upon the ground that the evidence did not support the verdict.
2. While there may be some inaccuracies in the charge, the court’s charge upon the controlling issue contained proper instructions to the jury.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
136 S.E. 142, 163 Ga. 371, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 84, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-bros-v-harrell-ga-1926.