Rosden v. Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of United States

206 F.2d 439, 92 U.S. App. D.C. 327, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 2766
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJune 11, 1953
Docket11514_1
StatusPublished

This text of 206 F.2d 439 (Rosden v. Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosden v. Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of United States, 206 F.2d 439, 92 U.S. App. D.C. 327, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 2766 (D.C. Cir. 1953).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In 1907 Amalie Janner, née Schaefer, an American citizen, through marriage became a citizen and resident of Germany. Later she acquired property from the estate of her father, an American citizen and resident. During World War II the property so acquired was vested in the United States under § 5(b) of the Trading with the Enemy Act, 40 Stat. 415 (1917), as amended 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 5(b). Upon these facts Mrs. Janner’s administrator sued in the District Court under § 9(b) (3) of said Act for return of the vested property. The court dismissed the action with prejudice upon authority of Feyerabend v. McGrath, 1951, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 33, 189 F.2d 694. There this Court holds that § 9(b) (3) was temporary legislation applicable only to property seized during World War I. Admittedly this appeal seeks an overruling o£ that decision. We adhere to it.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Feyerabend v. McGrath Atty. Gen.
189 F.2d 694 (D.C. Circuit, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
206 F.2d 439, 92 U.S. App. D.C. 327, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 2766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosden-v-brownell-jr-attorney-general-of-united-states-cadc-1953.