Roscoe W. Fields, Sr. v. Kyle Testerman, Etherage C. Leach, Robert Wooldridge, Randy Lockmiller, Ben McGovern Allen Elliot, and Evelyn Wells

843 F.2d 1391, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 4525, 1988 WL 31543
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedApril 11, 1988
Docket87-6134
StatusUnpublished

This text of 843 F.2d 1391 (Roscoe W. Fields, Sr. v. Kyle Testerman, Etherage C. Leach, Robert Wooldridge, Randy Lockmiller, Ben McGovern Allen Elliot, and Evelyn Wells) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roscoe W. Fields, Sr. v. Kyle Testerman, Etherage C. Leach, Robert Wooldridge, Randy Lockmiller, Ben McGovern Allen Elliot, and Evelyn Wells, 843 F.2d 1391, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 4525, 1988 WL 31543 (6th Cir. 1988).

Opinion

843 F.2d 1391

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Roscoe W. FIELDS, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Kyle TESTERMAN, Etherage C. Leach, Robert Wooldridge, Randy
Lockmiller, Ben McGovern, Allen Elliot, and Evelyn
Wells, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 87-6134.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

April 11, 1988.

Before LIVELY, Chief Judge, RALPH B. GUY, Jr., Circuit Judge, and AVERN COHN, District Judge.*

ORDER

This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the record and briefs, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).

This pro se plaintiff appeals the district court's judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 civil rights complaint.

Seeking monetary relief, plaintiff brought suit alleging violation of his due process rights when his car was impounded and he was arrested and convicted of interfering with the towing of his car. The district court dismissed the complaint as time-barred. Upon review, we affirm the district court's judgment for the reasons stated by it in its memorandum opinion dated September 22, 1987. Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

*

The Honorable Avern Cohn, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
843 F.2d 1391, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 4525, 1988 WL 31543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roscoe-w-fields-sr-v-kyle-testerman-etherage-c-leach-robert-ca6-1988.