Roscoe v. South Carolina Department of Corrections

Fourth Circuit

Roscoe v. South Carolina Department of Corrections

46 F. App'x 727

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 30, 2002·No. Nos. 02-6955, 02-7024·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Larmarko S. Roscoe seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001) and the district court’s order denying a certificate of appealability. We have reviewed the record and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Roscoe has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabilty and dismiss Roscoe’s appeal of each order. See Roscoe v. South Carolina Dep’t of Corrections, No. CA-01-3168-6-24AK (D.S.C. May 24 & June 19, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Larmarko S. Roscoe seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001) and the district court’s order denying a certificate of appealability. We have reviewed the record and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Roscoe has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabilty and dismiss Roscoe’s appeal of each order. See Roscoe v. South Carolina Dep’t of Corrections, No. CA-01-3168-6-24AK (D.S.C. May 24 & June 19, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Roscoe v. South Carolina Department of Corrections, 46 F. App'x 727 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

46 F. App'x 727 (Roscoe v. South Carolina Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related