Roscoe v. South Carolina Department of Corrections

46 F. App'x 727
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 30, 2002
DocketNos. 02-6955, 02-7024
StatusPublished

This text of 46 F. App'x 727 (Roscoe v. South Carolina Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roscoe v. South Carolina Department of Corrections, 46 F. App'x 727 (4th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Larmarko S. Roscoe seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001) and the district court’s order denying a certificate of appealability. We have reviewed the record and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Roscoe has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabilty and dismiss Roscoe’s appeal of each order. See Roscoe v. South Carolina Dep’t of Corrections, No. CA-01-3168-6-24AK (D.S.C. May 24 & June 19, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 F. App'x 727, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roscoe-v-south-carolina-department-of-corrections-ca4-2002.