Rosboro Lumber Company v. Employee Benefits Insurance Company

Oregon Supreme Court

Rosboro Lumber Company v. Employee Benefits Insurance Company

680 P.2d 386, 297 Or. 81, 1984 Ore. LEXIS 1331

CourtOregon Supreme Court

DecidedMay 1, 1984

DocketCA 25849 SC S30222 16-82-01824

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 680 P.2d 386 (Rosboro Lumber Company v. Employee Benefits Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosboro Lumber Company v. Employee Benefits Insurance Company, 680 P.2d 386, 297 Or. 81, 1984 Ore. LEXIS 1331 (Or. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

680 P.2d 386 (1984) 297 Or. 81

ROSBORO LUMBER COMPANY, a Partnership, Respondent On Review,
v.
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS INSURANCE COMPANY, a California Corporation, Petitioner On Review. and Rollins Burdick Hunter of Oregon, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, Formerly Cole, Clark & Cunningham, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, Defendant.

CA 25849; SC S30222; 16-82-01824.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

On Petition for Review Submitted November 30, 1983. May 1, 1984.

Miller, Nash, Wiener, Hager & Carlsen; James N. Westwood, Bruce A. Rubin and John A. Lusky, Portland, submitted the petition for the petitioner on review.

Hoffman, Morris, Giustina & Fox and Michael F. Fox, Eugene, submitted the Response to the Petition for Review for respondent on review.

MEMORANDUM OPINION.

Petition for review of 65 Or. App. 679, 672 P.2d 1336, allowed. Reversed and remanded to trial court for reinstatement of its original Judgment.

Mountain Fir Lumber Co., Inc. v. Employee Benefits Insurance Co., 296 Or. 639, 679 P.2d 296 (1984).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

680 P.2d 386 (1984) 297 Or. 81

ROSBORO LUMBER COMPANY, a Partnership, Respondent On Review,
v.
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS INSURANCE COMPANY, a California Corporation, Petitioner On Review. and Rollins Burdick Hunter of Oregon, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, Formerly Cole, Clark & Cunningham, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, Defendant.

CA 25849; SC S30222; 16-82-01824.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

On Petition for Review Submitted November 30, 1983. May 1, 1984.

Miller, Nash, Wiener, Hager & Carlsen; James N. Westwood, Bruce A. Rubin and John A. Lusky, Portland, submitted the petition for the petitioner on review.

Hoffman, Morris, Giustina & Fox and Michael F. Fox, Eugene, submitted the Response to the Petition for Review for respondent on review.

MEMORANDUM OPINION.

Petition for review of 65 Or. App. 679, 672 P.2d 1336, allowed. Reversed and remanded to trial court for reinstatement of its original Judgment.

Mountain Fir Lumber Co., Inc. v. Employee Benefits Insurance Co., 296 Or. 639, 679 P.2d 296 (1984).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

680 P.2d 386, 297 Or. 81, 1984 Ore. LEXIS 1331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosboro-lumber-company-v-employee-benefits-insurance-company-or-1984.

Opinion

ROSBORO LUMBER COMPANY, a Partnership, Respondent On Review, v. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS INSURANCE COMPANY, a California Corporation, Petitioner On Review. and Rollins Burdick Hunter of Oregon, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, Formerly Cole, Clark & Cunningham, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, Defendant.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

ROSBORO LUMBER COMPANY, a Partnership, Respondent On Review,
v.
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS INSURANCE COMPANY, a California Corporation, Petitioner On Review. and Rollins Burdick Hunter of Oregon, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, Formerly Cole, Clark & Cunningham, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, Defendant.