Rosati v. Senkowski

221 A.D.2d 675, 633 N.Y.S.2d 231, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10697
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 2, 1995·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

[676] Petitioner was an inmate at a minimum security prison. As the result of an incident in which petitioner met with a female companion outside prison grounds to smoke a marihuana cigarette, petitioner was found guilty of smuggling, possession of a controlled substance and escape. He challenges only that part of the administrative determination finding him guilty of escape and argues that it is not supported by substantial evidence. Upon review of the record, we find that the misbehavior report and the testimony of the correction officer who prepared it constitute substantial evidence supporting the administrative determination. It is undisputed that petitioner was apprehended 30 to 50 yard southside facility grounds in a wooded area and that his companion was armed with a gun. Under these circumstances, the administrative determination must be confirmed.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Casey, Yesawich Jr. and Spain, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosati v. Senkowski, 221 A.D.2d 675, 633 N.Y.S.2d 231, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10697 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

221 A.D.2d 675 (Rosati v. Senkowski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gee v. Goord
21 A.D.3d 636 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)