Rosas v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided August 22, 2017·No. 12-754·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 12-754V Filed: July 28, 2017

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The Estate of EDUARDO ROSAS * UNPUBLISHED Decedent, by and Through * JENNY ROSAS, as Personal * Representative, * * Petitioner, * Decision on Joint Stipulation; v. * Transverse Myelitis (“TM”); Death; * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccination SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Isaiah R. Kalinowski, Esq., Maglio Christopher and Toale, PA, Washington, DC, for petitioner. Ann D. Martin, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1

Roth, Special Master:

On November 5, 2012, Eduardo Rosas (“Mr. Rosas”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 On April 10, 2015, Jenny Rosas (“Ms. Rosas” or “petitioner”) was substituted as legal representative for the estate of Mr. Rosas upon his death. ECF No. 43. Petitioner alleges that Mr. Rosas developed transverse myelitis and/or the significant aggravation of transverse myelitis as a result of receiving an influenza

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), a party has 14 days to identify and move to delete medical or other information, that satisfies the criteria in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B). Further, consistent with the rule requirement, a motion for redaction must include a proposed redacted decision. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within the requirements of that provision, I will delete such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).

1 vaccination on August 16, 2011. Petitioner further alleges that Mr. Rosas’ death was the sequalea of his alleged vaccine-related injury. Respondent denies that the influenza vaccine caused petitioner’s injury and/or death. See Stipulation, ECF No. 82 at ¶¶ 1-6.

Nevertheless, the parties have agreed to settle the case. On July 27, 2017, the parties filed a joint stipulation agreeing to settle this case and describing the settlement terms. Respondent agrees to issue the following payment:

A lump sum of $150,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Jenny Rosas, as Legal Representative of the Estate of Eduardo Rosas. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 300aa- 15(a).

I adopt the parties’ stipulation attached hereto, and award compensation in the amount and on the terms set forth therein. The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Mindy Michaels Roth Mindy Michaels Roth Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ____________________________________ ) The Estate of EDUARDO ROSAS, ) Decedent, by and through JENNY ROSAS, ) as Personal Representative, ) ) Petitioner, ) No. 12-754V ) Special Master Roth ) ECF ) SECRETARY OF HEALTH ) AND HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) ____________________________________)

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Eduardo Rosas (“Mr. Rosas”) filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 to 34 (the “Vaccine

Program”). Ms. Jenny Rosas (“petitioner”) was substituted as petitioner upon Mr. Rosas’ death.

The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to Mr. Rosas’ receipt of the

influenza vaccine, which is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R.

§ 100.3(a).

2. Mr. Rosas received an influenza immunization on August 16, 2011.

3. The vaccine was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that the influenza vaccine caused Mr. Rosas to suffer transverse

myelitis and/or the significant aggravation of transverse myelitis and that Mr. Rosas experienced

the residual effects of this condition for more than six months. Mr. Rosas died on August 3, 2013. Petitioner further alleges that Mr. Rosas’ death was the sequela of his alleged vaccine-

related injury.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages on behalf of Mr. Rosas as a result of his alleged vaccine-related injury or his death.

6. Respondent denies that Mr. Rosas suffered transverse myelitis, the significant

aggravation of transverse myelitis, or any other injury as a result of his influenza vaccine, and

denies that Mr. Rosas’ death was the result of a vaccine-related injury.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the

issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with

the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue

the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum of $150,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner as Legal Representative of the Estate of Eduardo Rosas. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa- 15(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and after

petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings

before the special master to award reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in proceeding

upon this petition.

2 10. Payment made pursuant to paragraph 8 of this Stipulation and any amounts awarded

pursuant to paragraph 9 of this Stipulation will be made in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-

15(i), subject to the availability of sufficient statutory funds.

11. Petitioner represents that she presently is, or within 90 days of the date of judgment

will become, duly authorized to serve as legal representative of Mr. Rosas’ estate under the laws

of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosas v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2017).

Rosas v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Rosas v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-12
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B)
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a